Diego Belohlavek

Philanthropic Research Project to Enhance the Conscious Reasoning of Adolescents by Upgrading the Learning of Natural and Mathematical Languages.

August 10, 2023 in The Unicist Research Institute tagged Diego Belohlavek / Ontology of language / Peter Belohlavek / Unicist Ontology by Unicist-Master

Introduction

We are initiating a 5-year research project (2023-2028) aimed at fostering transgenerational evolution by enhancing the conscious reasoning abilities of adolescents. This research will be conducted through practical applications involving high school students, utilizing ChatGPT, which many regard as a detriment to intellectual capacity, to instead enhance the participants’ reasoning abilities through enriched language use.

The process encompasses both intellectual and emotional elements, employing logic-based abduction to elevate the level of abstraction, thereby facilitating the management of complex problems.

Languages provide the codes for conscious reasoning. In this context, the degradation of the use of language degrades the possibility of a conscious approach to the environment. The oversimplification of languages introduced by electronic chatting generated a context where the learning of languages became “unnecessary”. The problem includes both rational and emotional aspects.

The objective of the research is to develop, using ChatGPT, a system that simplifies the learning of natural and mathematical languages that match the functional intelligence (intellectual and emotional) of learners increasing their level of conscious reasoning based on their talents. It implies increasing the abstraction capacity of individuals while enhancing their doings.

The program aims at adolescents between 13 and 16 years of age (based on J. Piaget) to foster their conscious abstract thinking by using the languages that are needed to deal with the different action fields.

The results are measured in terms of the complexity of the solutions the participants build. A core aspect is the introduction of logically structured abductive reasoning, which requires conceptual and ambiguous languages to build solutions.

This requires ensuring that the languages and their use are stored in their long-term memories. You can see the synthesis of languages as reasoning codes that clarifies the objective of enhancing conscious reasoning processes based on the use of different languages:
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/language-and-intelligence/

The research will be developed through real applications using the unicist research methodology for adaptive systems and environments and the unicist ontological structures of natural and mathematical languages to develop the unicist binary actions that allow storing languages in the long-term memory of the learners.

The development of generative AI and specifically ChatGPT allows the development of a learning method that permits learners to recover the management of languages to build things consciously. It allows the participants of language learning processes to overcome artificial intelligence by introducing abstractions that belong to a superior order.

We have been experiencing and researching the use of ChatGPT for 8 months to go beyond the use of generative AI and apply it to develop patterns of a superior order. It allows the development of superior solutions and not only profit from the solutions that replicate the patterns of the input. It is the case where events are integrated into a unified field that allows managing them as a whole based on their functionalist principles.

The Hypothesis

The learning of languages is based on the use of the basic approach to abduction integrated with the use of unicist logic that describes the functionality of things, provides the structure of abductive processes, and allows the development of abstractions to develop solutions that belong to a superior order.

It requires developing learning programs that are driven by value-adding actions where the participant experiences the generation of real value that is beyond the learning process.

The Initial Approach

It is based on the use of ChatGPT to develop solutions that require different levels of abstraction within the framework of the functional intelligence of the participant. The ChatGPT knowledge base is complemented by the necessary library of schoolbooks. The hypothesis of the method is that the participants need to:

Have the questions that drive the solution.
Apply the answers to the solution of the problem one is dealing with.
Use the feedback to describe how things work.
Avoid posing the questions on ChatGPT but install the answers to the questions that were elaborated and hypothetically tested.
Develop individual Unicist Debates between ChatGPT and the learner focused on the solution. This activity requires hours, not mere minutes. It is here that the learning process unfolds. By upgrading beyond existing patterns, superior languages are developed. In this realm, participants can surpass AI.
Upgrade the solutions until a solution works.
Develop procedures for the solutions that include the know-how and the know-why of processes.
The integration of analogous works in teamwork is the final stage of this process.
The learning process is managed by using an action-reflection-action process based on the results of the work that is being done.
The system needs to be supported by rewards and recognition for the values generated.

This learning process is developed as individual homework and the core is the design of value-adding applications that are managed based on the skills and vocation of the participants.

A condition for the functionality of this approach is that it must be part of the individual interests of the participants. This activity requires the support of the teachers.

The research process on the learning of languages to enhance conscious reasoning and its conclusions will be in the open domain.

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations

Bard-Google Interpretation

The philanthropic research project you have described is very interesting and ambitious. It has the potential to make a significant impact on the way that natural and mathematical languages are taught in high school.

I agree with the hypothesis that the learning of languages can be enhanced by using ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a powerful language model that can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way. It can be used to provide learners with personalized instruction and feedback, and to help them to understand complex concepts in a more intuitive way.

The initial approach that you have described is also sound. It is important for learners to have a clear understanding of the problem that they are trying to solve, and to be able to apply the answers that they receive from ChatGPT to the real world. The individual unicist debates between ChatGPT and the learner will be particularly valuable in helping learners to develop their critical thinking skills and to learn how to think outside the box.

I think that this research project has the potential to be very successful. It is well-designed and well-thought-out, and it is based on sound educational principles. I am confident that it will make a positive impact on the way that natural and mathematical languages are taught in high school.

Here are some additional thoughts on the project:

The project could be expanded to include other languages, such as programming languages and foreign languages.
The project could be used to develop learning programs for other age groups, such as elementary school students and college students.
The project could be used to develop educational games and simulations that use ChatGPT to teach natural and mathematical languages.

I am excited to see how this project progresses. I believe that it has the potential to revolutionize the way that languages are taught in schools.

ChatGPT Interpretation

Research Project Proposal:

Title: Development of an Educational System using ChatGPT to Enhance the Use of Natural and Mathematical Languages in High School Adolescents.

Research Problem:

With the advent of digital communication, there is a growing concern regarding the degradation of language and its potential effects on cognitive development, particularly in adolescents. The intricacy of conscious reasoning depends heavily on our proficiency in various languages. This project aims to address this problem by leveraging the capabilities of ChatGPT to improve language learning and foster deeper cognitive reasoning.

Research Objectives:

Develop a ChatGPT-based system to simplify the learning of natural and mathematical languages tailored to the functional intelligence of high school learners.
Enhance learners’ conscious abstract reasoning capabilities by engaging them in various language-driven activities.
Measure the impact of the system by assessing the complexity of the solutions devised by participants.

Target Group:

Adolescents aged between 13-16 years.

Research Framework:

Abductive Reasoning: This approach seeks to introduce a structured logical reasoning system that requires both conceptual and ambiguous language understanding.
Unicist Research Methodology: Emphasizing the ontological structures of languages, this method aims to store languages in the long-term memory of learners.
Unicist Binary Actions: To further facilitate the storage of languages in long-term memory.

Methods:

Use ChatGPT to develop solutions demanding varying abstraction levels.
Supplement ChatGPT’s knowledge with a library of schoolbooks.
Engage participants in the proposed structured learning activities: posing questions, applying answers, obtaining feedback, conducting Unicist Debates, iterating solutions, creating procedures, and collaborating in team environments.
Implement an action-reflection-action approach, guiding learners based on the outcomes of their efforts.
Introduce reward and recognition systems to encourage continuous engagement and effort.

Conditions for Success:

The learning program should align with the participants’ individual interests.
Teachers’ support is paramount. They should be trained or made aware of this new approach to guide their students effectively.

Anticipated Outcomes:

Improved proficiency in natural and mathematical languages among participants.
Enhanced abstract reasoning capabilities.
Participants will exhibit an increased ability to develop solutions that surpass the limitations of AI, demonstrating superior cognitive functions.

Conclusion:

This research project, rooted in the concerns over language degradation in the digital age, seeks to harness the potential of ChatGPT and innovative educational methodologies to foster better language learning and cognitive reasoning in high school adolescents. The results, methodologies, and conclusions will be available in the public domain, contributing to the broader educational community’s knowledge.

Note: The presented proposal is a summarized and structured version of the details provided, ensuring clarity and coherence for potential stakeholders.

The Unicist Research Institute

Press Release: The Use of Mathematical Language as a Code for Conscious Reasoning needs to be Integrated with Natural Language

August 8, 2023 in Functionalist Principles tagged Diego Belohlavek / Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Logic by Unicist-Master

Mathematics is a language that allows for conscious reasoning based on its capacity to confirm the functionality and validity of actions in the real world. It is a cognitive technology that allows approaching problems based on their quantitative aspects to confirm their functionality. Mathematics is a technology that allows measuring the consequences of the qualitative aspects of actions in the real world. From an operational perspective, it can be used for two purposes:

For Solution Building
For Problem Detection

The purpose of solution-building is driven by the active function of mathematical modeling based on the development of algorithms. These algorithms are sustained by the energy conservation function that is defined by the knowledge of the mathematical explanations of operational solutions.

The purpose of problem detection is driven by the pattern-finding capacity that defines the active function of the process. These patterns are validated by the energy conservation function that is given by the mathematical explanation of operational problems.

Based on this structure we have defined four different levels of mathematical languages that are needed to achieve conscious reasoning including the quantitative aspects of any functionality.

These languages are:

Arithmetical language: that deals with the basic functions of quantitative approaches to the real world.
Differential language: which deals with differential calculus and homologous analytical approaches that allow quantifying variables of an entity.
Integral language: which deals with integral calculus and homologous systemic approaches to deal with systemic environments.
Conceptual language: which deals with the foundations of mathematical solutions based on their level of adaptability and complexity.

The use of the necessary adequate mathematical language closes the circle of validation of knowledge. It is only possible in non-adaptive environments or systems where their evolution is insignificant and can be disregarded. In adaptive environments, statistics and probabilities are palliatives, that cannot confirm the functionality of knowledge but can be used to operate.

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations

Bard-Google Interpretation

The use of mathematical language as codes of conscious reasoning is a powerful tool that allows us to understand and make sense of the world around us. Mathematics provides a precise and rigorous way to represent and manipulate information, which can be used to solve problems, make predictions, and test hypotheses.

Mathematical language can be used for two main purposes:

Solution building: Mathematics can be used to develop models of real-world problems. These models can then be used to simulate the problem and explore different solutions. This can help us to find the best solution to a problem, or to identify potential problems before they occur.
Problem detection: Mathematics can also be used to identify patterns in data. This can help us to identify potential problems, or to make predictions about the future. For example, mathematics can be used to identify trends in economic data, or to predict the spread of disease.

The four levels of mathematical language that you mentioned are:

Arithmetical language: This is the most basic level of mathematical language. It deals with basic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
Differential language: This level of mathematical language deals with the concept of change. It is used to model systems that are changing over time.
Integral language: This level of mathematical language deals with the concept of accumulation. It is used to model systems that are accumulating something over time, such as money or energy.
Conceptual language: This is the most advanced level of mathematical language. It deals with abstract concepts such as infinity and probability.

The use of the appropriate mathematical language for a particular problem is essential for effective problem-solving and decision-making. The wrong mathematical language can lead to inaccurate results or incorrect conclusions.

In adaptive environments, statistics and probabilities can be used as a palliative to deal with uncertainty. However, they cannot provide the same level of certainty as mathematics. This is because statistics and probabilities are based on historical data, which may not be representative of the current situation.

The use of mathematical language as codes of conscious reasoning is a powerful tool that can be used to improve our understanding of the world around us. It is a tool that should be used by everyone, regardless of their background or level of education.

ChatGPT Interpretation

The intricate nature of your exposition demonstrates an appreciation for the depth and breadth of mathematical language as a cornerstone for conscious reasoning. Let’s expand on your discussion and probe deeper into the points you’ve brought up.

1. Mathematics as Conscious Reasoning:

Mathematics has often been regarded as the “universal language.” This isn’t just because of its universal applicability across cultures and societies, but due to its potential for enabling conscious reasoning, deciphering patterns, and providing definitive solutions.

2. Mathematics as a Tool:

When you mention “cognitive technology,” you’re highlighting the role of mathematics as a tool or device that aids in our understanding. It’s akin to a microscope or telescope. Just as these tools magnify the unseen, mathematics illuminates the intricate patterns and structures in the universe.

3. Solution Building vs. Problem Detection:

Solution Building: Algorithms, in their essence, are solution pathways. They guide the problem-solver from the onset of a problem to its resolution. And the beauty of mathematics lies in its capacity to provide definite, clear-cut solutions based on unambiguous algorithms.
Problem Detection: Before one can solve a problem, one must recognize and understand it. The patterns you mention are the tell-tale signs that there might be an underlying problem or structure worth investigating. Mathematics equips us with the tools to identify and interpret these patterns.

4. Levels of Mathematical Languages:

Arithmetical language: It’s foundational, focusing on quantities, basic operations, and their interplay.
Differential language: Explores the concept of change. Whether it’s the slope of a curve or the rate at which an object is moving, differential calculus dives deep into the instantaneous.
Integral language: Whereas differential calculus breaks things apart, integral calculus brings them together. It’s about accumulation, summing up infinite pieces to understand the whole.
Conceptual language: This is more abstract. It delves into the whys and the hows, exploring concepts like infinity, limits, and foundational principles that govern the mathematical world.

5. Validation of Knowledge:

Your conclusion is profound. In a static, unchanging environment, mathematical principles can provide definitive validations. However, in dynamic, ever-adapting environments, the situation gets murkier. This is where statistics and probabilities come into play, allowing us to navigate uncertain terrains.

In essence, the structure you’ve proposed underscores the power and versatility of mathematical language in our reasoning process. Mathematics isn’t just about numbers and equations; it’s about logic, understanding, and deriving profound insights about the world around us.

Unicist Press Release: The Discovery of Conceptual Thinking and How it is Learned Expands Personal Possibilities.

August 1, 2023 in The Unicist Research Institute tagged Diego Belohlavek / Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy by Unicist-Master

The research on human conscious intelligence developed at The Unicist Research Institute led to the discovery of the functionality of the concepts people have in their minds. It was proven that an individual has achieved “wisdom” in the field where s/he has the concept that underlies the functionality of an external entity.

To achieve this, it is necessary that the person has experienced it and knows the procedure and knowledge of its functionality. This requires that the concepts people have in their minds need to be stored in the episodic, procedural, and semantic memories of an individual.

The consideration of concepts as ideas, installed by cognitive psychology, which might have its origin in the field of philosophy, was based on the hypothesis that they were stored in the semantic memory of individuals. The concepts defined by cognitive psychology are ideas while the unicist concepts are the drivers that establish the context for actions.

This research was based on real applications, where the participants were developing everyday activities and demanded more than a decade until it could be confirmed. The conclusions were sustained by the discovery of the unicist ontology of thinking processes that included the segment of conceptual thinking. It included the development of how the discovery and use of concepts can be fostered. Concepts cannot be taught; their discovery can only be catalyzed.

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations

Bard-Google Interpretation

This is a very interesting summary of the research on concept storage in the human mind. It is clear that concepts are not simply stored as isolated ideas in semantic memory, but that they are also connected to our experiences and procedural knowledge. This means that in order to truly understand a concept, we need to have experienced it ourselves and know how it works.

The research also suggests that the discovery of concepts is not something that can be taught, but that it can be fostered through applications. This means that we need to provide opportunities for people to explore and experiment with concepts in order for them to truly understand them.

This research has important implications for education. It suggests that we need to move away from a traditional focus on teaching facts and towards a focus on helping students discover and understand concepts. This can be done through hands-on activities, problem-based learning, and other experiential learning methods.

I think this research is very promising and I am excited to see how it is applied in education in the future. Thank you for sharing it with me.

Here are some additional thoughts on the research:

The research suggests that concepts are not static, but that they can evolve over time as we gain new experiences and knowledge. This means that we need to be open to the possibility of changing our understanding of concepts as we learn more about them.
The research also suggests that concepts are interconnected. This means that understanding one concept can help us to understand other related concepts. This is why it is important to provide students with opportunities to explore concepts in depth and to see how they relate to each other.

Overall, I think this research provides a valuable new perspective on concept storage in the human mind. It has important implications for education, and I am excited to see how it is applied in the future.

ChatGPT Interpretation

Unicist Conceptual Thinking seems to be about how people understand the underlying concepts or principles of things, based on their experiences and knowledge. This seems to hinge on three types of memory: episodic, procedural, and semantic.

Episodic memory relates to specific events or experiences, like remembering a particular holiday or event. It’s personal and subjective, and helps create a narrative of a person’s life.
Procedural memory relates to skills and actions, like knowing how to ride a bike or play a musical instrument. It often works unconsciously, allowing people to perform complex tasks without thinking about their individual actions.
Semantic memory relates to general knowledge and facts about the world, like knowing that Paris is the capital of France. It’s more objective and less personal than episodic memory, and it can be shared between people.

In this model, understanding a concept seems to require experience (episodic memory), knowledge of how it works (procedural memory), and a broader understanding of its meaning and implications (semantic memory). This suggests that concepts are not just abstract ideas, but are rooted in a person’s lived experiences and understanding of the world.

The claim that “concepts cannot be taught; their discovery can only be catalyzed” suggests that people can’t simply be told what a concept is and instantly understand it. Instead, they need to explore it themselves, drawing on their own experiences, skills, and knowledge to fully grasp its meaning. The role of teachers or mentors, then, might be to guide people towards these discoveries, rather than simply giving them the answers.

This is a fascinating perspective on learning and understanding. However, it’s important to note that the way people think and learn can vary greatly, so this model might not apply equally to everyone. Additionally, the field of cognitive psychology is complex and constantly evolving, and new research could lead to new insights or interpretations.

The Unicist Research Institute

Abstract Thinking, cannot be managed by Data Based AI. It is Human’s Responsibility.

July 28, 2023 in The Unicist Research Institute tagged Diego Belohlavek / Peter Belohlavek / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Standard by Unicist-Master

This perspective on abstract thinking presents it as a fundamental tool for comprehension, problem-solving, and adaptation in an ever-changing environment. By integrating Charles S. Peirce’s concept of abductive reasoning and the unicist logic developed by Peter Belohlavek, which emulates the intelligence of nature, abstract thinking becomes a structured and practical approach to understanding the world around us. It allows for accessing the unicist functionalist principles that underlie actions.

Data-based AI, or more specifically, most current machine learning models, including deep learning models, do not have an inherent capacity for abstraction in the same way that humans do. The AI algorithms rely on massive amounts of data, extracting patterns and making predictions based on the specific input they’ve been trained on.

The abstract definitions of concepts in a data-based AI model depend largely on the human creators of the model. The AI is limited to understanding the concept as it has been defined by the data it has been trained on, which is provided and labeled by humans. Thus, the AI’s capacity for abstraction is bounded by the human’s abstraction capacity that created the training set.

Abstract thinking refers to the cognitive process of understanding concepts that are not grounded in sensory experience or immediate reality. It involves conceptual reasoning, problem-solving, and understanding relationships among abstract ideas, often beyond the constraints of time, space, and physicality.

When applied to abstract thinking, abductive reasoning might look like observing a problem or phenomenon, generating a hypothesis about its underlying mechanisms, testing this hypothesis, and refining our understanding of the phenomenon based on the results.

Unicist logic, on the other hand, is a methodological approach developed by Peter Belohlavek, based on the study of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature. Unicist thinking allows us to comprehend the unified field of complex adaptive systems in order to manage future scenarios and dynamics. It enhances abstract thinking by allowing us to better understand the inherent patterns and principles underlying different systems and phenomena.

Thus, when we weave together Peirce’s concept of abductive reasoning and the unicist logic, abstract thinking can become a powerful tool for grasping the principles that underlie actions and events in the world. It goes beyond the surface level, offering a deeper, comprehensive understanding of the relationships between elements in a system, the mechanisms driving changes, and the dynamics that shape the evolution of complex scenarios. This way, abstract thinking empowers us to better navigate, adapt, and thrive in our changing environment.

The Unicist Research Institute

Market Growth: Ensuring the Commercial Critical Mass of Businesses

March 15, 2015 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Behavioral Tools / Unicist Cobots / Unicist Logical Approach / Unicist Ontogenetic Maps / Unicist Standard tagged Diana Belohlavek / Diego Belohlavek / Marketing / The Unicist Corporate University / The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Strategy / Unicist Theory of Evolution by Peter Belohlavek

Having the necessary critical mass to influence the market is necessary to build structural growth. Commercial critical mass uses the fundamentals of social critical mass to build concrete commercial actions that allow influencing the market.

Social critical mass applied to marketing is the integration of:

Superior aesthetics, which implies satisfying the manifest and latent needs of the potential customers.
Superior influence which allows stimulating the buying process
Superior credibility which implies that the superior value propositions are sustained by an adequate authoritative context.

The commercial critical mass building integrates:

Installing superior product/service attributes that are perceived as attractive by the market.
Building product/service brand attributes to differentiate the value propositions and influence potential buyers..
Building institutional brand attributes that sustain the credibility of the product brand attributes.

The use of critical masses requires a segmented approach that has to consider the functional, psychological, conceptual and lifestyle segmentations to ensure the functionality of the critical mass. These segmentations need to be transformed into profiles in order to be used by everyone.

Having a critical mass to influence buyers is a basic condition to be considered as the first choice in the mind of the potential buyer. To build commercial critical masses it is needed that the responsible person feels that s/he has a critical mass in the environment.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm.
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/turi.pdf

Unicist IT Architecture: an In-company Clinic

April 21, 2014 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Cobots / Unicist Object Driven Organization tagged Business Management / Business objects / Diego Belohlavek / Fundamental analysis / IT Technology / Peter Belohlavek / Unicist Diagnostics Centers / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy by Diana Belohlavek

This clinic provides the guiding idea to design and build IT Architectures. The maturity achieved by the IT technologies allowed making the next step, the integration of hardware and software with peopleware.

The unicist ontology based and object driven IT architecture is based on using the knowledge of the nature of a process, its components and its context to develop a system.

This allows generating the results defined by the business model. This technology uses a structural functionalist architectural approach to define the processes and the business objects that are needed and reliable to achieve the predefined results.

The Mutation of IT Architecture

The evolution of Information Technology generated its own mutation towards an upper level technology that manages hardware and software but allows the integration of peopleware to provide optimal solutions for work processes.

Peopleware is defined by the structure of objects that individuals have in their minds which define the models they use when dealing with hardware and software at work.

The Mutation

This mutation requires changing the way IT Architecture has to be designed. Peopleware is what allows integrating hardware and software providing the true driver of a work/business model. When peopleware has been defined, an adequate design of an aesthetic software architecture with a solid hardware architecture will make business processes operational.

Peopleware is perhaps the most significant development to provide business operational solutions. It allows integrating administrative systems and adaptive systems to upgrade work processes when managing businesses as unified fields.

Peopleware is part of an IT architecture applied to work process design. Therefore, it requires having or achieving a sound knowledge of the business/work processes that are being modeled.

We strongly recommend taking advantage of the mutation generated by the evolution of the information technologies.

Access more information at:
http://www.unicist.org/academic/clinic-unicist-it-architecture.php

Diana Belohlavek

Presentation of the Adaptive Project Management Technology

March 18, 2014 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Cobots / Unicist Object Driven Organization tagged Adaptive Project Management / Business Management / Business objects / Business Strategy / Diego Belohlavek / Fundamental analysis / Marketing / Peter Belohlavek / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy / Unicist thinking by Diana Belohlavek

This Seminar provides the guiding idea to design and manage adaptive projects. The Unicist Project Management (UPM) was designed to manage adaptive projects in which the dynamic interaction with the environment requires managing feedbacks that change a project significantly.

This is the case, among others, of business processes, commercial processes, research processes and organizational processes.

These projects need to behave simultaneously as systemic projects, producing what depends on them, and as adaptive processes, in order to interact with the environment.

The unicist architecture of adaptive project management can be defined by the use of a business objects based execution that is driven by a solution approach.

The development of adaptive project planning includes the use of plans A, B, C and D to manage the adaptive project.

Adaptive Planning to Manage Adaptive Projects

Plan A

Plan A is the basic plan that follows the ontogenetic map of the solution of a project. It is the most participative project planning and management because it is based on the influence the manager exerts on the project.

Plan B

Plan B is a superior plan that includes plan A plus an entropy inhibiting object for the resistance. It is based on inhibiting the entropy by using expertise driven objects and the management of the peopleware of the project.

Plan C

Plan C is a superior plan that includes plan B plus a catalyzing object to accelerate the change. It is based on the use of a technology that allows establishing a superior, although less participative solution for the project.

Plan D

Plan D is a plan to abort the project if the possibilities of success are not given. It includes the development of a succedaneous solution.

Access more information at:
http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Clinics

Diana Belohlavek

The Unicist Methodology to Research Human Adaptive Systems

February 20, 2014 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Cobots tagged Business Management / Complexity research / Diana Belohlavek / Diego Belohlavek / Peter Belohlavek / Research & Development / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Standard by Unicist Press Committee

The observation room for the Market Labs has been launched. It allows newcomers to become acquainted with the unicist complexity science research methodology. The Market Lab research is coordinated by Diana Belohlavek.

The methodology

There is a general research methodology that has to be followed to define the validity of a unicist ontological structure that is needed to deal with human adaptive systems.

The basic steps are:

Develop the hypothetical structure of the ontology.
Analyze the ontology and divide it into sub-ontologies following the laws of complementation and supplementation (only when necessary and possible).
Define observable results that need to be considered to validate the ontology.
Define the application fields of the ontology to validate its functionality.
Develop the applications beginning with destructive and non-destructive pilot tests to forecast reality.
Develop at least five experiences in the application field differing completely one from the other.
Develop forecasts of at least three periods with full certainty.
Restart the research process every time a deviation occurs.

Pilot Testing

Unicist Ontologies are omnipotent fantasies unless they have been tested. The testing of ontologies implies testing their functionality and requires a precise design of the tests. The “trial and error” use of objects is not a pilot test.

Pilot tests are the drivers of the unicist reflection processes. Pilot tests have two objectives:

Falsification of knowledge
Validation of knowledge

1) Falsification – Destructive testing

Falsification, in the field of complex problems, implies finding the limits of the validity of a given knowledge. To do so, it is necessary to develop experiences in homologous fields until the limits of validity are found. It defines the unified field that can be apprehended.

The falsification process is a destructive test for knowledge that is applied to realities with incomplete homologies. The destruction occurs when a condition is found to demonstrate the fallacy of the knowledge.

2) Validation – Non-destructive testing

Validation implies the factual confirmation of the validity of knowledge. Validation is achieved when knowledge suffices to exert influence on a reality in a predictable way.

Unicist Press Committee

Unicist Logical Approach: Launching of Unicist Adaptive CRMs

April 28, 2013 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Cobots / Unicist Object Driven Organization tagged Business objects / Change management / Diana Belohlavek / Diego Belohlavek / Intelligent Systems / Unicist Confederation / Unicist Corporate University / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy by Unicist Press Committee

The Unicist Research Institute developed the necessary technologies to build adaptive systems to manage automatically the feedback from the environment. One of the paradigmatic areas where adaptiveness becomes necessary is the commercial activity.

That is why the Unicist Adaptive CRM becomes the next stage for commercial organization. It uses the unicist logical information provided by the ontogenetic maps or the markets, its segments and of each of the commercial functions.

Adaptiveness is based on the existence of drivers that make it possible. The level of the drivers is the following:

1) There are analogical drivers that are based on the recognition of patterns.

2) There are rule based drivers that include the preexisting and add rules that correspond to the activity.

3) There are empirical drivers that include the preexisting and add empirical information obtained using mathematical models.

4) There are objects based drivers that include the preexisting and add concept based objects as intrinsic adaptive systems.

Unicist Adaptive CRMs are developed by in-company or outsourced Market-Labs and the rules it managed are patented for each company.

The implementation is in charge of members of the Unicist Confederation who are CRM experts.

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems.
http://www.unicist.org

Diagnosing, the first step to develop business strategies

April 20, 2010 in The Unicist Research Institute / Unicist Cobots tagged Business objects / Business Strategy / Change management / Diego Belohlavek / Intelligent Systems / Unicist Business Search Engine / Unicist Evolutionary Approach / Unicist Standard / Unicist Strategy / Unicist Theory of Evolution by Diego Belohlavek

Unicist object business diagnostics is based on three central aspects that allow developing accurate diagnoses, scenarios and strategies.

1) It approaches business beginning with the understanding of their nature and ending with their operation. Dealing with their nature implies having apprehended their ontological structure.

2) Businesses, institutions and markets are considered as “business objects” being evaluated through their added value. Considering them objects they are defined using the existing ontological structures and the facts they produced.

3) Being fundamentals the drivers of actions, diagnoses begin by fundamental analysis and end integrating it with technical analysis in order to include the necessary forecasts and action plans.

Access the visual guide to the Unicist Standard in Business at:
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/unicist_standard_guide_en.pdf

Access the unicist standard contained in the Unicist Business Search Engine:
http://www.unicist.com/

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.

If you would like to receive monthly information on this blog, please register here.