Translate this page

Unicist Double Dialectical Logic: A Universal Logic


The unicist double dialectical logic is a universal logic to deal with adaptive environments and is the integrator of all logical reasoning patterns. The different logical patterns define different reasoning structures to develop solutions.

The unicist double dialectical logic is an emulation of the intelligence and strategy of nature that allows developing maximal strategies to grow, minimum strategies to ensure results and defining the double dialectical actions that ensure the generation of value. It integrates philosophy, sciences and actions in a unified field to manage the functionality, dynamics and evolution of adaptive processes.

Human actions are driven by the concepts people have in their mind that are stored in their long-term memory. To influence human adaptive actions, it is necessary to use double dialectical actions that allow accessing the concepts people have in mind. This approach is necessary to deal with: strategy, marketing, management, IT architecture, teamwork, politics, social behavior, economic behavior, education, etc.

This unicist logic integrates the Western and Eastern approaches to understand the nature of things.

The unicist double dialectical logic was developed to manage the unified field of complex adaptive systems consciously.

Conscious reasoning allows developing fallacy-free decisions and actions to ensure the results of what intends to be achieved.

The purpose of consciousness is to discriminate reality in order to be able to differentiate the outside an individual needs to deal with, from the inside the individual uses to emulate the external environment.

The different logical approaches define different reasoning structures to develop reliable solutions.

The unicist double dialectical logic is the natural logic to deal with adaptive environments and is the integrator of all logical reasoning patterns.

It is homologous with the “category theory”, which is the mathematics that integrates the different mathematics by using a superior level of abstraction.

The Pathway to Complex Problem Solving

The unicist logic was created by Peter Belohlavek to develop solutions in complex adaptive environments. It allows managing their nature based on their concepts and fundamentals. Complex adaptive systems have open boundaries, that make them feedback dependent.

The unicist logic is a double dialectical logic that allows developing double dialectical actions in adaptive systems to ensure the generation of results.

It requires managing both the KNOW WHY and the KNOW HOW of the functions and processes involved. This logical approach simplified and ensured the generation of value in adaptive environments.

Double Dialectical Actions to Manage Adaptiveness

Influencing adaptive environments requires the development of simultaneous double dialectical actions to influence each adaptive function of the environment.

It requires defining the ontogenetic maps of the functions that are involved, their maximal and minimum strategies, and developing the consequent double dialectical actions to ensure the generation of results.

The adaptive behavior of social and institutional environments is homologous to the behavior of nature. Their ontogenetic maps have a triadic structure that requires going beyond dualistic thinking using the double dialectical logic and developing double dialectical actions.

Double Dialectical Actions: An Emulation of Nature

The unicist double dialectical logic to influence adaptive systems and environment was created by Peter Belohlavek in 1986 and is an emulation of the triadic structure of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature.

The double dialectical logic drives towards double dialectical actions that allow transforming abductive, inductive and deductive reasoning processes into value adding actions.

Its application allowed its author to develop the structure of complexity sciences to study and deal with adaptive systems and environments.

The use of double dialectical logic allows emulating the structure of adaptive systems to develop double dialectical actions to manage their dynamics and evolution.

Double dialectical reasoning allows individuals to apprehend and manage the concepts and fundamentals of adaptive environments to influence them by developing double dialectical actions that include the use of catalysts.

This has to happen within the scope of what is possible to be achieved and following the evolutionary synchronicity. The use of double dialectical actions in adaptive environments requires the use of catalyzing objects and has to occur within the limits of a functional wide context.

Going Beyond Dualism

Dualistic thinking is “the” aprioristic fallacy when dealing with adaptive systems that have biunivocal relationships with their contexts. Dualism is only functional in non-adaptive environments driven by univocal cause-effect relationships. The consequence of dualistic thinking is that people believe in a dialectical behavior. Adaptation becomes impossible when using dualistic thinking.

The dualistic dialectics of Hegel and Marx transformed this dualistic approach into a social myth that provided an oversimplified perception of reality and a way to influence it. Both dialectics are only functional in non-adaptive environments.

While the neural functionality is dualistic (neurons are “on” or “off), the ontogenetic intelligence of nature is triadic. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate two dualistic approaches to apprehend the nature of things and develop double dialectical actions to influence adaptive environments.

Dualistic Dialectics vs. Double Dialectics is the battle between the exclusive disjunction “OR” and the conjunction “AND”.

The unicist double dialectical logic, which is based on human ontointelligence and on the use of the conjunction “AND”, allows dealing with the dynamics, evolution and nature of adaptive environments and provided the structure to build the unicist artificial intelligence. Non-adaptive environments are considered a “particular case” of adaptive systems.

Logic can be defined as the formalization of a fallacy-free reasoning process to solve specific categories of problems. There are as many logical reasoning patterns as there are different categories of problems that have been solved using a conscious reasoning process. The unicist logic integrates the existing logical patterns by emulating the triadic intelligence of nature.

Fields to Experience Complex Problems Solving:

The 4th Industrial Revolution (1) and the Social Lab (2)

The Unicist Logic was developed to manage the complexity of adaptive systems and environments that have open boundaries and, as such, cannot be managed using dualistic approaches.

It requires experiencing the different aspects in one’s field of experience to get acquainted with the approach. It can be experienced at a personal, institutional or social level.

1) Implementation of the 4th Industrial Revolution

The Unicist Evolutionary Approach to the 4th Industrial Revolution is based on 8 pillars that provide the operational approach to foster growth, profitability and sustainability using the technologies available in the 4th Industrial Revolution. They are:

  1. The Unified Field Management: to manage the unified field of the concepts of business processes, to define what is possible to be achieved and how to make it happen.
  2. Unicist Strategy: to develop maximal and minimum strategies, within the limits of what is possible to be achieved, to grow and ensure results.
  3. The Use of Catalysts: to accelerate business processes and ensure the achievement of results in adaptive environments.
  4. Double Dialectical Actions: based on unicist double dialectical logic to ensure the functionality and sustainability of adaptive systems and environments.
  5. Timing: to ensure the synchronicity and functionality of processes.
  6. Business Objects: to accelerate business processes and ensure their quality.
  7. Conceptual Design: to define the architecture of the unified field of business solutions.
  8. Pilot Tests: to develop pilot tests to ensure results, find the root causes of problems and develop their solutions.

The unicist evolutionary approach to businesses increases their adaptability and their speed of growth and improves their profitability in an environment of customer orientation and sustainability. Access

2) Social Lab: Microeconomics driven Development – A Transgenerational 50-year Project

Cultural changes occur along multiple generations and are catalyzed by technological changes. Therefore, the introduction of structural changes in cultures requires, necessarily, having a transgenerational approach to evolution.

It requires understanding the fundamentals of the behavior of the coming generations to define the framework to introduce structural changes, knowing the need for change that exists and having catalysts that allow sustaining the need for such change.

It is a 50-year transgenerational project that is based on taking advantage of the adolescent rebellions to install those values which are self-evident when evolution is a value.

There are two possible dominant evolutionary roles that are fostered in a society:

  1. The Adaptive role, that is driven by the need of personal freedom
  2. The Over-adaptive role, that is driven by the need of personal security

The present generation of a culture should provide an evolutionary framework for the evolution of the following generations but is not responsible for their evolution.

Microeconomics driven Development is based on the empowerment of the cultural belonging, the value of work, the value of learning, the installation of a second opportunity ethics and the society’s ban on facileness in leadership. Access

Basic Knowledge to Generate Value in Adaptive Environments

1) Unicist Strategy – A Double Dialectical Approach

The Unicist Strategy is a unicist evolutionary approach that uses the unicist logic to achieve results in organizations and adaptive environments. It is based on managing the conceptual structure of the processes and their fundamentals and having the necessary technical resources to develop the necessary double dialectical actions to influence the environment.

There are different levels of strategies that require managing their complexity:

The Subjective Strategy deals with personal strategies in individualistic environments (One-star strategy). Its complexity level is extremely low.

The Operational Strategy deals with the assurance of the operational actions of an organization (Two-star strategy). Its complexity level is low.

The Non-Influential Strategy deals with the development of defensive strategies (Three-star strategy). Its complexity level is medium.

The Specific Strategy deals with the expansion of the boundaries of an activity (Four-star strategy). Its complexity level is high.

The Universal Strategy deals with the occupation of new spaces in the environment (Five-star strategy). Its complexity level is very high.

2) Unicist Double Dialectical Reasoning

The unicist evolutionary approach is based on the discovery that human actions are driven by the concepts they have in their minds, which are triggered by the conceptual short-term memory (CSTM).

This approach manages the concepts and fundamentals of processes and is synthesized in the unicist strategy and the unicist double dialectical logic that emulate the intelligence, organization and evolution of nature to develop maximal strategies to grow and minimum strategies to ensure results.

It uses abductive, inductive and deductive reasoning to forecast, produce and ensure results. Abductive reasoning is used to access the concepts of things and define the possibilities of what can be achieved, inductive reasoning is used to develop destructive tests to confirm the limits of the validity of knowledge and deductive reasoning is used to develop validation tests and manage the operation.

Double dialectical reasoning allowed developing the unicist artificial intelligence that integrates abductive, inductive and deductive reasoning to develop logical inferences.

Unicist AI uses the ontogenetic maps of the unified field of the concepts and fundamentals of adaptive functions while learning from the environment through pilot tests.

3) The Use of Ambiguous Language to Manage Double Dialectical Actions

The integration of maximal and minimum strategies is perceived as ambiguous, which requires managing ambiguity in order to develop double dialectical actions. Ambiguous language is necessary to deal with ambiguity and to influence adaptive systems.

There are two different types of dialogues when using ambiguous language: the dialogue with the facts and the dialogue with the people who are participating in the solution. Pilot tests are the way to dialogue, using ambiguous language, with facts.

Ambiguous language is based on a maximal strategy driven by a “dialogue” and a minimum strategy driven by a “monologue”, which is an informative action. A dialogue itself is a biunivocal communication with mutual adaptation to the feedbacks received.

Maximal strategies are based on the conjunction “and”, and backward chaining thinking. This implies that a dialogue is possible if the final objective is in the mind of those who are dialoguing. When there is no final objective in the mind, there is no dialogue, just the coexistence of two monologues.

Maximal and minimum strategies are the two poles of any double dialectical action.

Unicist Double Dialectical Reasoning

Double dialectical reasoning allows being able to apprehend and manage the concepts and fundamentals of adaptive environments. It uses conscious adaptive reasoning processes, which require using abductive, inductive and deductive reasoning.

Unicist Double Dialectical Reasoning

Conscious adaptive reasoning requires managing ambiguous language in order to apprehend the ambiguous structure of adaptive environments, their concepts and fundamentals to design their functionality.

The use of double dialectical reasoning allows emulating the structure of adaptive systems and developing fallacy-free abductive reasoning.

In this context, abductive reasoning is necessary to manage the dynamics of complex adaptive systems and double dialectical reasoning allows managing abduction processes.

Double dialectical reasoning drives towards double dialectical actions that allow transforming abductive, inductive and deductive reasoning processes into value adding actions.

The Integration of all Logical Patterns

The Unicist Double Dialectical Logic is an emulation of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature discovered by Peter Belohlavek. It emulates the intelligence and organization of nature and allows understanding the root causes and the unified field of processes, evolution and behavior.

This logic, which is based on human ontointelligence, allows dealing with the dynamics, evolution and nature of adaptive environments and provided the structure to build the unicist artificial intelligence. Non-adaptive environments are considered a “particular case” of adaptive systems.

Logic can be defined as the formalization of a fallacy-free reasoning process to solve specific categories of problems. There are as many logical reasoning patterns as there are different categories of problems that have been solved using a conscious reasoning process.

Ontointelligence is the human intelligence that allows discovering the concepts and fundamentals of things. It is integrated by an ethical intelligence, a strategic intelligence and the logical type of thought that allow managing a high level of abstraction and simultaneously a high level of concretion.
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/the-roots-of-intelligence/ 

There are multiple logical patterns available to solve their homologous problems.

They can be classified based on the following categories: Propositional-logic approaches, Dualistic-logic approaches, Set-logic approaches, Fuzzy-logic approaches, Predicate-logic approaches and Integrative-logic approaches. The unicist double dialectical logic approach integrates them to deal with the dynamics, evolution and nature of adaptive systems and environments.

Triadic Functionality of Intelligence

The unicist double dialectical logic was created by Peter Belohlavek in 1986. Its application allowed its author to develop the structure of complexity sciences to study and deal with adaptive systems and environments.

It drove to the development of the unicist theory and to the discovery of the ontogenesis of evolution and established the basics to develop the unicist artificial intelligence. This logic provided the structure to develop the applied researches on social, individual and business evolution developed at The Unicist Research Institute.

Paradoxically, this unicist double dialectical logic requires both a superior level of abstraction to apprehend its structure and a superior level of operational thinking to apprehend the operation.

The use of the conclusions of this logical approach requires no abstractions, because they are self-evident. It only requires having experience in a specific action field.

Precedents of the Universal Logic

The unicist double dialectical logic goes beyond philosophy, and is a scientific approach to the drivers of behavior and evolution. The main epistemological precedents of the triadic and the double dialectical approaches can be found in:

  1. The triadic universal categories of Charles S. Peirce
  2. The fundamentals of learning processes of Jean Piaget
  3. The triadic structure and unified field of the TAO
  4. The conceptualization of Immanuel Kant
  5. The first principles of Aristotle

The Unicist Double Dialectical Logic

The unicist logic is a double dialectical logic that emulates the structure of the intelligence that underlies nature, which makes it belong to the field of complexity sciences and not philosophy. Paradoxically, this logic integrates the functionality of the preexisting logical approaches. The unicist thinking process allows emulating the double dialectical logic in mind in order to apprehend complex adaptive systems.

From Dualism to Double Dialectical Approaches

The dualism of neural functionality makes dualistic logical approaches become the natural way to deal with reality. This dualism is functional in operational environments, ruled by cause-effect relationships where the actors dominate the consequences of their actions.

Common sense is the consequence of having found recipes using dualistic logic. Common sense rules are pre-concepts that work as recipes for the one who uses them.

At an abstract level, truth tables are also the consequence of the use of dualism. In the field of dualistic approaches things are true or false, good or bad, etc.

The disjunction “OR” is the basic rule when dealing with dualistic approaches in operational environments. This makes people feel powerful because they establish the “OR” they need.

But when dealing with adaptive aspects of reality there is no possibility to define actions using a dualistic approach because the triadic structure of reality cannot be apprehended with a binary model.

The triadic structure of reality is defined by a purpose, an active function and an energy conservation function.

To apprehend this triadic structure with a binary mind it is necessary to be able to build a double dialectical approach in mind that emulates a specific reality.

This approach was named unicist double dialectical logic because it allows defining the unified field of adaptive systems in order to diagnose and influence them. It is based on the fact that in complex systems all the elements are integrated by the conjunction “AND”.

The Unicist double dialectical approach leaves behind the truth tables (True “OR” False) and replaces them with functional tables evaluating the functionality based on predefined purposes.

The unicist reflection process: action-reflection-action is the technology to be used to transform dualistic logical approaches into unicist double dialectical approaches in order to define complex adaptive systems.

This technology allows starting with the use of exclusive disjunctions “OR” and ending with the use of conjunctions “AND”.

This process requires that those who have decided to deal with complex problems need to be fully focused on producing results, have sound knowledge of the problem and have decided to influence it in an adapted way.

The paradox is that at the end the diagnoses and solutions found need to be transformed into operational “recipes” in order to make them manageable by ordinary people.

But it has to be considered that without being able to manage the triadic structure of complex adaptive systems, the diagnoses and solutions developed are either palliatives or fallacies that cannot produce meaningful results.

Unicist Logic applied to Reality

The dialectical logic of Hegel and Marx follow the natural dualistic operation of neurons (on/off). It is functional to rationalism.

The unicist double dialectical logic uses the dualistic operation of neurons to build a mental emulation of the structure of nature that allows dealing with the adaptive aspects of reality.

Unicist thinking is the name given to the process that allows building the double dialectical logic.

Unicist thinking allows emulating in mind the structure of adaptive aspects of reality in order to manage them. It provides the necessary operating system to manage adaptive systems to expand the boundaries of an activity and infer future scenarios in order to adapt.

Unicist thinking allows defining the nature of reality in a reasonable and provable way. It is based on double dialectical thinking in order apprehend nature emulating the ontogenetic intelligence of nature.

It is necessary to diagnose, build strategies and design architectures. It provides the structure to understand the fundamentals of an activity and integrate the fundamental knowledge with the technical analytical knowledge to make decisions.

The discovery of the unicist thinking approach is based on:

  • The discovery of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature that drives the evolution of living beings.
  • The discovery of onto-intelligence which is the human intelligence to adapt to the environment and is integrated by the ethical intelligence, the type of thought, and the strategic intelligence.

Unicist Thinking allows emulating the ontogenetic intelligence of nature using the double dialectical thinking. Its use is a demonstration that the dialectical approaches that Hegel and Marx developed to explain the evolution of human behavior are dualistic.

Complementation and Supplementation Laws

Unicist Thinking requires emulating in mind the complementary and supplementary relationships that integrate the double dialectic. The elements that are part of an entity in nature are integrated by supplementary and complementary relationships. There exist no other types of relationships in nature.

These relationships can be perfect or imperfect. When they are perfect the entity evolves in a stable way, when they are imperfect they generate a high level of entropy.

The purpose, the conservation function and the active function of a concept are integrated by logical rules which sustain their unity.

While the purpose and the active function are sustained by the supplementation law, the purpose and the conservation function are integrated by the complementation law.

Supplementation Law

It is a relation between elements with redundant purposes and active functions, having a different homeostatic element. One of the elements has a superior “myth” that challenges the evolution of reality.

Complementation Law

It is an interdependent relation between two elements, actions or ideas. Each one of these elements has what the other element requires and they both have a coincident homeostatic element.

Complements sustain the weaknesses of the purpose to avoid the entropy produced by the action.

When the homeostatic value can buffer the changes produced by the active function, the functionality/credibility zone is relatively stable. Learn more:
https://www.unicist.org/healthcare/complementation-and-supplementation-in-nature/

The Evolution and Involution Laws

When talking about evolution, we always refer to the evolution of a reality that is regulated by the multiple concepts organizing its “unified field”.

The Evolution Law

Evolution implies the existence of an ontological algorithm to achieve a purpose. The first step appears to be putting the purpose into action.

This implies a previous step: the understanding of the purpose. Then the first step is putting it into action. Without understanding no action is possible. The second step is then finding a way to optimize the energy; thus the energy conservation principle is applied.

The Involution Law

Involution begins at the same stage as evolution: understanding the purpose.

But when an individual cannot adapt to the environment s/he chooses to begin by conserving the energy in order to gain time to understand this reality. Learn more:
https://www.unicist-school.org/theoryofevolution/unicist-theory-of-evolution/

Examples of the Use of the Unicist Double Dialectics

Development of the Unicist Artificial Intelligence

The unicist artificial intelligence emulates the human reflection process to apprehend the concepts of complex adaptive systems and environments. It uses the rules of the unicist double dialectical logic and allows developing solutions and learning from the pilot tests of their implementation until their functionality has been confirmed.

The double dialectical logic is an emulation of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature that drives the functionality and evolution of complex adaptive systems and environments. The unicist artificial intelligence allows emulating the solutions of a complex adaptive system to build structural adaptive solutions.

The emulation of the reflection process of human intelligence requires two functions to make this possible: The learning function and the decision function.

The learning function allows confirming the functionality of actions based on the feedback of pilot tests.

The decision-making function of a UAI approach to reality, allows making automated decisions that work as conscious decisions based on the recycling though the learning function. Learn more:
https://www.unicist.org/conceptual-thinking/unicist-artificial-intelligence/

The Double Dialectics of Strategy

The unicist strategy is a conscious planning process to achieve possible goals developing maximal strategies to expand one’s boundaries and minimum strategies to ensure survival. It integrates expansive and defensive strategies as a unit.

Double dialectical actions begin with maximal strategy actions, followed immediately by minimum strategy actions integrated by the need to achieve a pre-defined purpose.

The unicist double dialectical approach allows defining interdependent strategies that permit achieving the goal of growing in adaptive environments. It enables the development of stable actions to expand in the environment.

The double dialectical approach in strategy building includes the development of diagnoses to define what is possible to be achieved in order to build the consequent strategies.

The dualistic approach necessarily over-simplifies the strategy building process promoting independent actions to expand and to survive.

The Double Dialectics of Marketing

The unicist adaptive marketing process requires integrating both the active selling process with the “receptive” buying-decision processes that establish the limits of the possibilities of ethical marketing actions.

Double dialectical actions begin with maximal strategy actions, followed immediately by minimum strategy actions integrated by the need to achieve a pre-defined purpose.

The unicist double dialectical approach allows integrating the synchronicity of actions based on the nature of the buying decision process, which always includes the different shapes adopted by the “desire-duty-convenience” stages.

On the other extreme, the dualistic approach to marketing is based on the use of active selling actions and substituting the consideration of the buying-decision processes, with the exertion of power, which adopts all the shapes that are needed to “force” a buying decision.

The Double Dialectics of Country Scenarios

The purpose of an evolutionary country is the social scenario that ensures the transcendence for the following generations, providing the necessary educational basis to sustain equal opportunities within a context of social institutionalization that provides the security framework for justice.

Double dialectical actions begin with maximal strategy actions, followed immediately by minimum strategy actions integrated by the need to achieve a pre-defined purpose.

The economic scenario is driven by the generation of social added value. The economic scenario is sustained by growth, which works as the catalyst of the country’s scenario. The lack of growth works as an inhibitor and drives towards involution.

The purpose of the political scenario is to build the necessary social capital that sustains the social scenario.

It is driven by a judiciary system that ensures equal opportunities and the social mobility, which works as an entropy inhibitor of internal conflicts.

The Double Dialectics of the Tao

Both the Unicist Double Dialectical Logic (Unicist Logic) and the TAO (pathway) deal with the principles that underlie nature.

The Tao gave birth to one.
One gave birth to two.
Two gave birth to three.
Three gave birth to all things…..

Tao Te Ching – Lao Tzu

The symbol of Yin and Yang, representing the TAO, necessarily emulates the structure of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature and is homologous with the Unicist Logic.

The integration of Yin and Yang builds the triadic structure of the Unicist Logic. Both the TAO and the Unicist Logic explain the structure of the unified field of the functionality of a specific reality including its dynamics and evolution.

The active principle and the energy conservation principle are intrinsically opposite to each other, like yin and yang, but they are complementary in its effects.

Yang is homologous to the dialectics between the purpose and the active principle. It defines the active functionality of an entity.

Yin is homologous to the dialectics between the purpose and the energy conservation principle. It defines the energy conservation functionality.

The Unicist Research Institute

Share