When dealing with adaptive / complex systems that have by definition open boundaries, individuals committed to find solutions need to understand the nature of the problem. And in order to understand the nature of a problem its ontology has to be understood.
The research on the UOIN was developed by Peter Belohlavek and started at the beginning of the 80’s. It was a step by step discovery based on the apprehension of the nature of social phenomena entering afterwards in the institutional and individual evolution. Its integration with biology and physics was the final stage that was achieved.
The ontogenetic intelligence is defined on one hand by a purpose and an action principle that puts the purpose into action sustaining its functionality and evolution or involution. On the other hand, the same purpose is sustained by the energy conservation principle that complements the purpose to avoid it being changed by the action principle. You can download the e-book at:
English: http://www.unicist.org/deb_uoin.php
Portuguese: http://www.unicist.org/br/deb_uoin.php
Spanish: http://www.unicist.org/es/deb_uoin.php
The Ontology of Ontology
Living beings naturally transfer their functionality to the environment where they act, depositing functions that have the living being’s same logical structure and that generate the existence of extrinsic concepts.
Extrinsic concepts have the same logical structure but they are not implicit in inanimate beings; they are deposited by the living beings they are functional to. This is the origin of the ontology that has been used for many years in philosophy and now also in the field of systemic sciences, complexity science and to deal with adaptive systems. This is what unicist ontology is about.
Peter Belohlavek found that systemic methodologies did not apply to the research of complex systems where there is a conjunction of objects and/or subsystems. Influencing the future meant understanding the nature of a reality in its essence and not from an analytic-rationalistic approach.
To “manage” the nature of businesses the understanding of the ontogenetic intelligence of nature is necessary. You are welcome to deal with the nature of reality in order to be able to develop diagnoses, scenarios, forecasts and strategies. In the field of adaptive systems “playing by ear” produces paradoxical results. The intuition has to be confirmed. This is just one case where the saying “hard training, easy combat” is confirmed.
© The Unicist Research InstituteYour comments are welcome.
Executive Committee
To translate this post, click on the title to open it and then click on your flag in the right menu.
If you would like to receive monthly information on new scientific developments, please register here.
If you would like to get acquainted with unicist technologies, you can participate in a module of Unicist Strategy.
Country Archetypes Developed
• Algeria • Argentina • Australia • Austria • Belarus • Belgium • Bolivia • Brazil • Cambodia • Canada • Chile • China • Colombia • Costa Rica • Croatia • Cuba • Czech Republic • Denmark • Ecuador • Egypt • Finland • France • Georgia • Germany • Honduras • Hungary • India • Iran • Iraq • Ireland • Israel • Italy • Japan • Jordan • Libya • Malaysia • Mexico • Morocco • Netherlands • New Zealand • Nicaragua • Norway • Pakistan • Panama • Paraguay • Peru • Philippines • Poland • Portugal • Romania • Russia • Saudi Arabia • Serbia • Singapore • Slovakia • South Africa • Spain • Sweden • Switzerland • Syria • Thailand • Tunisia • Turkey • Ukraine • United Arab Emirates • United Kingdom • United States • Uruguay • Venezuela • Vietnam
Hasta ahora, a pesar de que he tratado de penetrar en la “inteligencia ontogenética”, tengo la impresión de que se trata de un juego de palabras que se repiten sin tener una idea clara de qué significan realmente.
Me agradaría encontrar ejemplos que muestren cómo se aplican los conceptos en casos concretos. Un caso es el de la complementariedad y la suplementariedad que, lingüísticamente, tienen significados similares, pero que en las definiciones que se dan en los textos del Unicist Research Institute tienen diferencias radicales.
De modo que quisiera ver un uso más apropiado del lenguaje.
creo que es una magnífica información para comprender mejor la realidad compleja y así se podrá facilitar la acción sobre la misma
Estoy muy agradecido por el trabajo muy relevante que están compartiendo con nosotros.
Yo realizo estudios epistémicos. No se si es lo mismo que ustedes quieren hacer.
Agradezco la permanente asistencia bibliográfica que tan gentilmente me hacen llegar.
Desde luego, y como no podía ser de otra manera, su lectura es lenta, como también su asimilación.
La cotidianeidad de la vida, me nutre de ejemplos, y muchas veces advierto la aplicación práctica de algunos conceptos de los libros; pero en otros casos no. Este comentario lo hago a partir de uno de v/libros que se llama “Estrategias Personales” y que leo con bastante asiduidad.
Desde ya muy agradecido;
Víctor Hugo Tourn.
deseo leer el libro
Como les comenté en mi nota anterior, el libro estrategias personales es el que más me atrae en este momento debido a la cercanía con hechos cotidianos que me remiten a él.