Diego Belohlavek


 

 

Press Release: The Presentation on Unicist Reflection Driven Education to Manage the Know-How and Know-Why of Business Processes

The research on human adaptive learning, developed at The Unicist Research Institute, led to the finding of four structural stages that deal with the learning of the management of adaptive environments and the management of the root causes in these environments.

The learning process of the know-why of things and its integration with the know-how is necessary to learn to manage adaptive systems that are continuously adapting to the feedback from the environment.

It required developing an educational model that allows learning the use of functionalist principles to manage the know-why and unicist binary actions to manage the know-how. This model required the development of Teaching Hospitals in Business where the participants develop solutions while they learn to manage the know-why and the know-how of things based on a reflection-driven learning technology.

The four structural stages are:

Stage 1 – Finding Homological Benchmarks – Learning WHAT FOR

This stage drives the definition of what has to be produced. It needs to be a solution for third parties. To begin the process, the participants need to find in their minds the concepts of other experiences they had to work as homological benchmarks. A learning process on the functionality of adaptive environments can only begin if the learner has a homological benchmark in mind.

Stage 2 – Learning the Functionalist Principles and the Fundamentals define WHAT needs to be achieved.

The relevant aspects of a given reality are defined by the functionalist principles and fundamentals that underlie it. The learning process of the functionalist principles and their fundamentals is given by the use of learning objects that allow understanding the unified field of an adaptive system. The goal of these objects is to provide the functionalist principles and the fundamentals of the specific relevant aspects of reality.

Stage 3 – Developing solutions and Pilot Tests – Learning the HOW of things.

The pilot tests are real applications in the specific action field that is being learned or in homologous fields when the full real application is too risky. Pilot tests allow learning HOW the knowledge works and is transformed into actions. The recycling process of the pilot tests drives the learning process in adaptive environments. It includes the use of destructive tests that confirm the limits of the validity of specific functionalist knowledge.

Stage 4 – Unicist Reflection – Learning the WHY of the functionality of things.

Unicist reflection is a pilot-test-driven reflection process. It uses abductive reasoning, unicist logic, and unicist deductive and inductive approaches to develop solutions.

Unicist Reflection requires having a final picture in mind, which means that the solution has to be emulated. It requires positive thinkers; individuals who see the bottle as half full, not half empty.

The specific reflection of the results of pilot tests produces improvements in the application process of what is being learned. It requires having a personal value-adding approach to seek the root causes of problems and build solutions.

The process ends when the destructive tests confirm the limits of the validity of the solutions

The unicist reflection-driven education model is based on five pillars:

  1. A learning context is required before a learning process begins. Learning processes in adults require the existence of a real problem to be solved.
  2. An adaptive learning contract that defines the guiding idea of the learning process and the conditions of the teaching and learning activities.
  3. The development of business residencies, which are homologous to medical residencies, where the unicist reflection methodology is used to develop solutions.
  4. The use of learning objects that allow for managing the personalized learning program of participants.
  5. The professor’s role is focused on ensuring the development of solutions while guiding and catalyzing learning activities.

Artificial Intelligence Interpretations

Bard-Google Interpretation

The Unicist Reflection Driven Education model is a learning model that focuses on the management of the know-how and know-why of business processes. It is based on four structural stages:

  • Finding Homological Benchmarks – This stage is about defining what the learning process is for. It requires participants to find homological benchmarks, which are concepts from other experiences that can be used as a basis for learning.
  • Learning the Functionalist Principles and Fundamentals – This stage is about learning the functionalist principles and fundamentals that underlie a given reality. Functionalist principles are the laws that govern the behavior of a system. Fundamentals are the specific aspects of a system that are relevant to its functionality.
  • Developing Solutions and Pilot Tests – This stage is about developing solutions and testing them in real-world environments. Pilot tests allow participants to learn how knowledge works and is transformed into actions.
  • Unicist Reflection – This stage is about reflecting on the results of the pilot tests and using that reflection to improve the application of what is being learned. Unicist reflection is a pilot-test-driven reflection process that uses abductive reasoning, unicist logic, and unicist deductive and inductive approaches to develop solutions.

The Unicist Reflection Driven Education model is based on five pillars:

  • A learning context – A learning context is required before a learning process can begin. This context provides the motivation and framework for learning.
  • An adaptive learning contract – An adaptive learning contract defines the guiding idea of the learning process and the conditions of the teaching and learning activities.
  • Business residencies – Business residencies are homologous to medical residencies, where the unicist reflection methodology is used to develop solutions.
  • Learning objects – Learning objects are digital resources that can be used to support learning. They can include text, images, videos, and simulations.
  • The professor’s role – The professor’s role in the Unicist Reflection Driven Education model is to ensure the development of solutions while guiding and catalyzing learning activities.

The Unicist Reflection Driven Education model is a powerful tool for learning the know-how and know-why of business processes. It is based on a solid theoretical foundation and has been used successfully by businesses and organizations around the world.

ChatGPT Interpretation

The Unicist Reflection Driven Education model, as described above, is an advanced, holistic approach to teaching and learning, particularly when dealing with complex adaptive systems and business processes. It moves away from the traditional way of knowledge transmission and embraces an iterative, experiential method, prioritizing the understanding of underlying principles (know-why) in tandem with practical skills (know-how).

Let’s break down some key takeaways from the model:

  • Nature of Learning: The model emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing adaptive systems. In business, where processes, strategies, and environments continuously evolve in response to internal and external feedback, a deep understanding of the root causes becomes indispensable. This learning model is designed to teach individuals how to understand and manage these very intricacies.
  • Stages of Learning: The four-stage process is progressive and iterative, beginning with identifying what needs to be learned (using past experiences for context) and moving through understanding the foundational principles, practicing the learned skills in real-world scenarios, and reflecting on the outcomes.
  • Homological Benchmarks: Using past experiences to understand new learning materials can help students contextualize and relate the information to their prior knowledge, thus making learning more effective.
  • Functionalist Principles: It’s crucial to grasp the underlying fundamentals of any subject. By understanding the core principles, one can adapt this knowledge to various scenarios.
  • Pilot Tests: Practical application is essential for any learning. By testing knowledge in real or similar situations, one can identify gaps and iterate on their understanding.
  • Unicist Reflection: Reflection is a powerful tool in the learning process, allowing for deep dives into understanding the why and how of actions.

Pillars of the Model:

  • Learning Context: It’s true that adults typically learn best when faced with a tangible problem. The motivation derived from problem-solving can be a potent catalyst for learning.
  • Adaptive Learning Contract: Defining clear objectives and expectations for both the learner and instructor can streamline the learning process and keep everyone aligned.
  • Business Residencies: Just like in medicine, a residency in business provides hands-on experience, which can be invaluable in understanding the nuances and practicalities.
  • Learning Objects: Personalized learning ensures that individual needs are addressed, and students can learn at their own pace.
  • Role of the Professor: Moving away from traditional lectures, this model emphasizes the professor’s role as a facilitator and guide, ensuring practical application of knowledge.

Final Thoughts – The Unicist Reflection Driven Education model offers a comprehensive approach to understanding and applying complex business processes and concepts. It emphasizes real-world application, reflection, and personalized learning, which can be invaluable in today’s dynamic business environment. Implementing this model can be beneficial for institutions aiming to equip their students with a deep understanding of both theoretical and practical aspects of business.

The Unicist Research Institute


Unicist Education: The Adults’ learning process in complex adaptive environments

The learning context provides the framework that allows building a guiding idea to begin a learning process. The construction of the guiding idea of learning processes is the first stage to be fulfilled in order to make a learning process begin. Unfortunately, many adults prefer judging instead of assuming the role of a learner. Learning requires a personal decision that cannot be forced because adult people only learn what they need.

Learning ContextThe generation of a guiding idea requires that people are exposed to real value-adding actions and discover that they cannot achieve the necessary results with what they have.

The exposure of individuals to value-adding actions implies two alternative situations:

a) The individual can generate the necessary value.

b) The individual cannot generate it.

If the individual cannot solve the problem, there are two alternatives:

1) The individual is in a comfort zone and is not interested in acquiring a new knowledge to solve the problem.

2) The person needs and wants to learn to solve the problem.

Only the case b) 2) drives to a learning process. The design of learning processes needs to follow the unicist ontology of learning, which defines that, prior to a learning process, an individual needs to be exposed to a meaningful value generation process in order to be able to reflect on that experience and decide to learn or not to learn.

Unavoidably, the learning process in complex environments requires an action-reflection-action process that begins when the guiding idea of the learning objective has been defined. Meaningful guiding ideas sustain the success of learning processes.

Diana Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in using the unicist logical approach in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized leading research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. It has an academic arm and a business arm. http://www.unicist.org/repo/#Unicist


The Unicist Logical Foundations of Jean Piaget’s Theory

Adaptation, accommodation and assimilation were terms used by Jean Piaget to define the learning process. It has been sustained that the adaptation process, which is the final goal of human intelligence, follows two complementary processes: accommodation and assimilation.

The unicist approach has been using these concepts since the eighties considering them as a neural entity individuals have to approach learning processes. Therefore they have, as any entity, a purpose, and active function and an energy conservation function.

The purpose of this entity is to adapt to the environment, because this is the purpose of any healthy human being.

The active function is given by the accommodation process, that is the process in which the mind has to accommodate itself to the evidence with which it is being confronted.

This process is extremely energy consuming because it demands moving internal structures to find a way to adapt to the external environment. The accommodation process is supplementary to the adaptation process meaning that it is redundant but having a superior solution to adapt to the environment.

The changes proposed by the accommodation process are limited by the assimilation process. The assimilation process is the energy conservation function that allows adapting to the environment. The assimilation process consists in the integration of the external environment in the mind without changing the concepts the individual has.

Assimilation and adaptation are complementary which means that the assimilation provides the information that is needed to adapt to the environment.

Adaptation, accommodation and assimilation define the essential structure of a learning process which is nonexistent if individuals cannot adapt to the environment because they need to over-adapt to it. Over-adaptation implies a submissive, dominant or oppositional attitude towards the environment.

Conclusion

There exists no complementation between the accommodation and the assimilation processes. They are integrated by the adaptation process. That is why when adaption does not exist there is no possibility that an individual learns.

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a private global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. http://www.unicist.org


Unicist Thinking: Apprehending the Nature of Leadership

This is just an example to explain how to emulate a given reality in mind using the unicist thinking capacity in order to apprehend its nature.

The unicist ontology of leadership describes the nature of leadership in order to be able to use the adequate leadership for any situation.

Understanding the nature of leadership is basic to find the natural place to develop one’s activities. It also helps to understand how to influence people and how to respond to the influence of others.

The basics of leadership

Leadership is based on the need to sustain one’s authority. The participation of others is a condition of leadership. A leader is such because s/he is followed.

Therefore, in terms of the unicist logic, participation is the active function of leadership and the energy conservation function is given by the power a leader has to impose her/his authority. But this is a sort of paradox.

The energy conservation function is given by the power the individual “does not use”. If the power is used it consumes energy and, in fact, a double amount of energy, because:

  1. To impose something there is a need to exert power and consume energy.
  2. When power is exerted, authority is being lost, because it means that the authority of the individual has not been accepted. And in this case, an additional amount of energy must be invested to reconstruct the value of the authoritative role.

Participation poses another paradoxical dilemma:

  1. When the authority of the leader is extreme, for example a religious leader, the participation is not possible.
  2. When the participation is extreme, there is no possibility to accept an authoritative role.

Emulating Leadership in mind

The double dialectical thinking is what allows defining the concept of leadership. The construction is described in the following chart:

To make a valid emulation, the supplementation and complementation needs to be defined.

The preceding structure that defines the nature of leadership has been researched and you can find its abstract at:
https://www.unicist.org/talents/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/unicist_leadership_en.pdf

Unicist Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute was the pioneer in complexity science research and became a global decentralized world-class research organization in the field of human adaptive systems. http://www.unicist.org


The Unicist Fundamentals of Mozilla

A navigator is the person on board of a ship or aircraft responsible for its navigation. The navigator is not the captain, but provides the information to the captain in order to make adequate decisions. Therefore, the navigator’s primary responsibility is to be aware of the ship or aircraft’s position at all times.

A Navigator on the Internet is an object that substitutes the individual that navigates a ship or airplane to position the user in the World Wide Web.

In business there are many activities that are homologous to navigators:

-Market Research
-Strategic Positioning
-Diagnosing
-Scenario Building
-Information Technology, etc.

In order to benchmark Mozilla’s experience we would consider that it is a way to navigate the Internet providing alternatives to the “captain” in order to use the platform as a tool to develop the activity s/he has planned.

The Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) is simpler. It provides basically a rigid navigation platform to ensure that individuals can access information. IE doesn’t pretend to be an adaptive platform. It pretends to be a simple access to the Internet. Thus it is the natural navigator for individuals who just use Internet as an access to information.

The more participative the design of the navigators, the more flexible they can work. The more flexible they are, the higher the level of the “persons” to deal with them.

Mozilla is an example that can only be benchmarked if it is experienced in real use, as well as its comparison with the Internet Explorer Concept.

This benchmark will help you design adaptive systems. The Unicist Standard allows developing flexible designs with quality assurance.

We recommend listening to John Lilly’s lecture, CEO of Mozilla.  You will access the core fundamental of Mozilla’s success.

Access the lecture at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2771Tlr_38

Access the unicist standard contained in the Unicist Business Search Engine:
http://www.unicist.com/

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution.

Unicist Strategy

If you would like to receive monthly information on this blog, please register here.

Follow us on twitter


Benchmarking Mozilla: grasping unicist fundamentals

Listening to the lecture of  John Lilly, CEO of Mozilla, you will access the core fundamental of Mozilla’s success.

It will drive you to a different world.

Access the lecture at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2771Tlr_38

In two weeks you will find the answer on this blog.

Suggestion: Reflect on it. The answer is between the lines.

It is included in the unicist standard contained in the Unicist Business Search Engine:
http://www.unicist.com/

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution.

Unicist Strategy

If you would like to receive monthly information on this blog, please register here.

Follow us on twitter


Aesthetics is the core of Steve Jobs’ business approach

Apple’s success is based on the capacity of perceiving the latent needs of the market and delivering original innovative solutions.

We hope you made the effort to learn from Steve Jobs about Apple’s fundamentals as we proposed.

If you still haven’t done the “homework” we recommend watching the video before following the reading of the answer to the questions posted:

http://unicist.net/it/learning-from-steve-jobs-apple%E2%80%99s-fundamentals/

We consider that the core fundamental of Apple is aesthetics. But aesthetics is not beauty. It goes beyond.

Apple products are aesthetic because they complete the needs of their prospect clients, they are desirable and harmonic. They also include inaccessible aspects that basically deal with innovative technology.

It can be said that the integration of an innovative technology with the fulfillment of latent needs are the core fundamentals that drive Apple’s business.

Steve Jobs is a doer himself

“Doers make things happen. Therefore, more than ever before, it is time for doers in the world.”

Doers are very special individuals. They are basically individuals whose fulfillment is based on doing transcendent things. They need to achieve what they have decided to do. When things cannot be done the easy way, they find the necessary path to make things happen.

“The world is built by doers and enjoyed by followers”. The joy of doers is in the deed itself.

We hope this has been useful.

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity sciences applied to individual, institutional and social evolution.


Learning from Steve Jobs: Apple’s fundamentals

Listening to the lecture of Steve Jobs you will access the information you need to understand the core fundamental of Apple’s success.

Access the lecture at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

Next week you will find the answer on this blog. It is included in the unicist standard contained in the Unicist Business Search Engine.

Suggestion: Reflect on it. The answer is between the lines.

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity sciences applied to individual, institutional and social evolution.